We Are Better Off Without The Spoilt Splitters

Seven MPs have quit the Labour Party today, citing the Party’s Brexit strategy and failure to tackle Antisemitism as the issues behind their decision. But are these really the reasons they’ve made like a Banana and split? The right of the party have form on this. When Labour were on track to win a GE under Michael Foot, the gang of four, supported vociferously by a terrified establishment, formed a new party to split the left vote. The right of the Party only approve of broad churches when they are the Arch Bishops and the left are the altar boys – seen but not heard.

Even before Corbyn’s first leadership win, the right of the party have been doing everything in their power to sabotage a Corbyn led Labour Party. They have blamed Corbyn for everything from misogynistic trolling and Antisemitism to Brexit, in their bid to lose him support. That’s not to say Antisemitism does not exist. Recent figures revealed that 0.1% of the current membership have been investigated or disciplined for Antisemitism, and both MPs and members are divided over Brexit. However both Antisemitism and divisions over Brexit exist in wider society, therefore it is nigh on impossible for Labour to be free of these issues entirely. That’s not to say more can’t be done. But if these MPs felt strongly enough about turning Labour around, they should have stayed to fight for change from within, just like so many Left wing MPs did when they were in despair over the pro-war, pro-privatisation agenda of the New Labour government. The fact they have left, tells you this isn’t about those things, it’s about the leaving, and the damage that can be done to Labour through their leaving. Its about splitting the left vote, just as it was in 1981. This is history repeating itself.

The response to this split has been reasonably calm on twitter. Yes, there is anger and indignation. The vast majority of members do not recognise Luciana Berger’s description of their party as institutionally Antisemitic, and that includes Jewish members. The implication for them is they are staying in a Jew hating party, which must be a particularly distressing accusation to have levelled at you if you are Jewish. The members are keenly aware there are major divisions over Brexit, but have huge respect for eachother and MPs across the Brexit divide, such as Clive Lewis and Dennis Skinner. So the members see through these disingenuous claims.

One major reason for the calm, is the fact this has been a long time coming. These MPs were always going to work relentlessly to damage us within the party (see screenshots below), so they might as well do it from the outside. They could never accept Corbyn’s leadership. They are not socialists and don’t approve of our direction of travel. They are like spoilt children who want to trash the Party now they are no longer in charge. And they are hypocrites. They shout repeatedly for a ‘People’s Vote’ because they claim people need a say on the changed circumstances of Brexit, but won’t call by-elections now they are no longer Labour MPs. They only support democracy when it goes their way, and we are sadly, better off without them.





  1. A6er · February 18, 2019

    Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating! and commented:
    The *Maleficent Seven finally leave our party, thank God!

    Let’s hope all those Labour MPs who don’t support Corbyn as leader or as our next Prime Minister fuck off too!

    We’ll get Corbyn into No10 a lot quicker now that these saboteurs are out!

    * Is Maleficent a word?
    This word is a bit old-fashioned and you don’t hear it often. But there are still plenty of maleficent people in the world — they’re the bad guys, the evil-doers, the folks who wish harm on others. Maleficent means something very close to malevolent or diabolical and is a lot stronger than naughty or mischievous.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: The Independent Group – ducksoap
  3. hirsutemal · February 19, 2019

    Reblogged this on MAL's MURMURINGS.


  4. Richael MacLaverty · June 5

    I read this article not long after the selfimportant splliters had announced that they were leaving. I liked it then. Reading it now in June after their DISMAL performance in the European elections is delicious!! I see that Vince Cable has said that ” the Lib Dems ‘ door is open”. According to Twitter posts on the internet on 23rd March 2018, Luciana Berger posted the following statement ” I asked the Leader’s Office about an explanation for this Facebook post first thing this morning. I am still waiting for a response’ ‘. The Facebook post related to a mural in East London by Mear One and according to a subsequent Twitter post Luciana Berger implied that the mural and / or the posts relating to it were anti-semitic. The leader was Jeremy Corbyn. There was nothing in her post to indicate that she had asked the leader or his representative(s) for an explanation prior to ‘ first thing this morning”. I hope she had. If not, is it reasonable behaviour to post publicly about it? I wonder if the Lib Dems have enquired to find out if she had raised this issue with the leader/ his representatives prior to ”first thing this morning”. If not , I wonder if their new leader would like to have a member in his/ her party who writes public posts about ” not yet having a response” from them. Is that really normal behaviour from someone in your own party?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s